home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.netins.net!usenet
- From: tempest@netins.net
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.games,comp.sys.amiga.graphics
- Subject: Re: Why are europeans dumb enough to buy amigas?
- Date: 9 Apr 1996 18:20:37 GMT
- Organization: INS Information Services, Des Moines, IA USA
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <009A099F.C640B4E7@netins.net>
- References: <4kd2hc$m2b@toad.stack.urc.tue.nl> <4kdf4l$69v@utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl>
- Reply-To: tempest@netins.net
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ins.netins.net
-
- In article <4kdf4l$69v@utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl>, pilon@cs.utwente.nl (Sander Pilon) writes:
- >In article <4kd2hc$m2b@toad.stack.urc.tue.nl>, haroldk@stack.urc.tue.nl (Harold Klink) writes:
- >
- >> Peecee?! Can you eat that?! PC......PC.....Pocket Calculator?!
- >>
- >
- >-Dont get me wrong. I've had an amiga for 9 yrz. (since ks 1.2) I've programmed every
- >byte of it. (Both os & hardware) -
- >
- >But i'd -really- like to see some benchmarks of an 68060/66 compared to my P133.
- >(Dont gimme the Amiga-os-is-better-crap or anything. Just the CPU benchmarks.)
- >Then see who's the pocket calculator here.
- >
- > Sander
-
- 060 50mhz is about the speed of a Pentium 75mhz. However when you factor in the
- crap ibm os's like Windows 95, and the poor slow/bloated applications to go
- with that, you end up with a Pentium ibm that runs slower than an 040 Amiga
- with most things. I am not into rendering so your Faster Pentium ibm's suck
- compared to a slower processor Amiga.. This should tell you something about
- ibm's software/os's.. They suck.
-
-
-